By DEBORAH
SONTAG and WALT
BOGDANICH - NY TIMES
Published: January 19, 2012
In a country where officials who abuse their power are almost never held accountable, 8 of 14 police officers tried for a 2010 prison massacre were found guilty on Thursday in the southern city of Les Cayes, Haiti
- SEE VIDEOS BELOW -
On the second anniversary of the massacre, Judge Ezekiel Vaval
handed down sentences ranging from 2 to 13 years of imprisonment and
hard labor. The stiffest sentences were given to the highest-ranking
officials, the former Les Cayes prison warden, Sylvestre Larack, and
the city’s riot police chief, Olritch Beaubrun, who was tried in
absentia.
Judge Vaval, who received frequent death threats during the three-month trial
and traveled to New York over the holidays to write his decision free from
pressure, delivered his verdicts to an initially hushed crowd of hundreds
packing the courtroom. He spoke rapidly, looking off into the distance, and then
rapidly departed as the audience erupted into cheers and jeers.
“The decision of the judge is his expression of the truth,” Judge Vaval said.
“There are other versions that exist but this is mine. And that is the law.”
VIDEO: The Police on Trial
VIDEO
The Killings at Les Cayes Prison
While it was a rough-hewn legal proceeding by American standards, the trial,
having taken place at all, represents a rare victory for the rule of law in
Haiti. Haitian government officials who break the law, be they police officers
or presidents, typically elude justice, benefiting from a weak, corrupt judicial
system.
“Wow, this is a real landmark moment for Haitian justice,” said William O’Neill,
an American human rights lawyer with decades of experience in Haiti. “To get
some senior law enforcement officials held accountable with fairly serious
sentences — it’s really historic.”
Fourteen officers were charged with murder, attempted murder and other crimes
for killing and wounding dozens of detainees in the aftermath of a disturbance
on Jan. 19, 2010, a week after the earthquake. The officers opened fire on
unarmed inmates “deliberately and without justification,” according to an
independent commission.
That commission, run jointly by the Haitian government and the United Nations,
was appointed after an investigation by The New York Times in May 2010
contradicted the official explanation for the deaths at the prison. Initially,
the Haitian government had accepted the local officials’ explanation that a
single detainee had killed his fellow inmates before escaping.
Mr. Larack, in fact, was promoted after the massacre to run the largest
penitentiary in the country; when the Times reporters tried to speak with him
there, he ordered them to destroy videotape of him refusing to answer questions.
And Mr. Beaubrun, before leaving the country for what his lawyer said were
medical reasons, told the reporters that his riot squad had never fired a shot.
But The Times found that police and prison officers had shot unarmed prisoners,
and witnesses at trial said that Mr. Beaubrun himself not only had ordered the
shootings but had participated in them.
The Times also reported that the police had moved some bodies before outside
investigators showed up and had hurriedly buried some victims in unmarked
graves.
The joint commission then conducted an investigation — although hindered by the
authorities’ initial failures to collect and preserve evidence — and prodded the
government to prosecute the offenders.
The prosecutor, Jean-Marie J. Salomon, charged that officers had killed 20
detainees, but the precise number of deaths and injuries is not known.
Testifying at the trial, one detainee, Patrick Olcine, said he had been shot in
the back but had never gone to the hospital. “They were taking dead people and
living people, and they were picking them up together,” he said. “I didn’t want
them to pick me up and go bury me.”
By American standards, the trial often had a circuslike atmosphere, with
protracted quarrels between screaming lawyers playing to the raucous crowds that
daily packed a theater in Les Cayes, Haiti’s third-largest city. Small bottles
of rum were on sale at the door, the trial was conducted in semidarkness when
fuel for the generator ran out and the judge, lacking a gavel, rang a small bell
in an often futile effort to gain control of the courtroom
Mr. Salomon inherited the case when he was appointed shortly before the trial.
He had never tried a case before, and trial observers said he was often
outmatched by highly seasoned defense lawyers.
The defense maintained that the police were just doing their jobs.
“But killing people was not doing their job,” said Florence Elie, Haiti’s
ombudsman.
The prosecutor asked the judge to sentence 11 of the defendants, including Mr.
Larack, to life in prison and hard labor. But Ms. Elie said that the judge, who
acquitted six of the officers, chose an equitable middle ground in his decision.
He gave Mr. Larack 7 years and Mr. Beaubrun 13.
“If they were civilians, they would have gotten life,” Ms. Elie said. “But the
judge was wise. If he had given the normal sentence, we would have had bigger
problems in the long run with our police force.”
Still, Ms. Elie said she was very concerned about reprisals because the
witnesses, the judge and the prosecutor had not been given protection, as
recommended by the joint commission. The chief witness for the prosecution was
threatened repeatedly and finally fled to Port-au-Prince, she said, adding that
she had not been able to locate him since.
Many Haitians wonder whether this trial could have a galvanizing effect on their
justice system, but they are wary of being hopeful.
Far bigger cases lie on the horizon.
Former President Jean-Claude Duvalier, for instance, has supposedly been under
investigation since his return from exile a year ago for human rights abuses
committed during his 15-year reign. But the investigation appears to have
stalled, and the new president, Michel Martelly, has shown no inclination to
encourage it.
Instead, Mr. Martelly has claimed that nobody in Haiti wants to see Mr. Duvalier
prosecuted and that the push to do so comes from “certain institutions and
governments” abroad.
Although supposedly confined to his house, Mr. Duvalier has made increasingly
frequent excursions, and presided over a promotion ceremony at the Gonaïves law
school last month.
But on Thursday, a judge summoned Mr. Duvalier to court to explain why he had
violated his house arrest.
Hi………….. This is a great site.
ReplyDelete